Adjustments once again to the division power and conference strengths as well as a top four upset resulted in some shifting of the rankings for the last week of the regular season.
Several out-of-conference games last week shifted the conference strengths around a bit which resulted in different starting ratings for the teams. That translated downstream to some shifts in the rankings this week, notably Texas Tech ranking 4th this week, down from 1st the last few weeks.
I had AI create an image of a man eating meat to use on a post-Christmas party invitation. I also did this last year. For your enjoyment, here are the two images.
Today we will get the second installment of the College Football Playoff committee’s rankings. Theirs will likely be wrong. That’s okay. Here is mine based on my algorithm. It is probably also wrong, but that is okay. I think it is close. This is just the math, no bias or emotion from me.
You make like or despise or completely not care about the College Football Playoff committee rankings. I have an interest and am curious about how “right” they get things. (There is a serious contention that they don’t care about getting it right, just about creating profitable matchups in the post-season.)
I have my own method to rank teams. I use a modified Elo ranking system which is non-discrete. The system considers strength of schedule, home field advantage, and point spreads up to 19 points (because anything beyond that is functionally meaningless). The system first ranks the FBS, FCS, Division II and Division III divisions based on cross-division games. The system then ranks the conferences, using the division rankings as the starting points, based on cross-conference games. The system then ranks the teams, using the conference rankings as the starting points, based on all games.
Disclaimer: I am a BYU fan. I have thought all season that BYU should be ranked above Miami and Boise State. You can see that my math does not agree with me. Here are the rankings based on my system.